|
Post by tristancloud on Sept 9, 2015 22:55:03 GMT -5
Yes but that screenshot was an alternate future that has been changed. In that future the Avatars' Utopia was still in effect and only lasted for an episode. Even if that was the current timeline, you could easily assume she is the only daughter old enough to be in the same age class as Wyatt and Chris. From a writer standpoint, they only had her with Wyatt and Chris because those are the only Charmed offspring we knew of at the time. Why would Leo and Piper be sending Phoebe's daughter off to school without her mother there? Where are the other Charmed cousins? The only thing that makes logical sense is for her to be Piper and Leo's son. I understand she didn't call them mom or dad, but neither did Wyatt or Chris. You can choose to believe it was someone else, but there is no question in my mind what the writers intended. They wanted each of the Charmed ones to have 3 children each. Their own little power of 3. Not that they'd magically be considered a new power of 3. Phoebe even mentions in season 8 how she wants her daughter to kick butt in groups of 3.
It's just so funny because I didn't mean for this board to be a discussion of how many children the Charmed ones truly had at all haha. Just a simple conversation of the possible witch/Cupid hybrid powers. Anyone else have any ideas how love could have been turned into a weapon when mixed with a witch's genes?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2015 23:48:55 GMT -5
Even if that was the current timeline, you could easily assume she is the only daughter old enough to be in the same age class as Wyatt and Chris. From a writer standpoint, they only had her with Wyatt and Chris because those are the only Charmed offspring we knew of at the time. Why would Leo and Piper be sending Phoebe's daughter off to school without her mother there? Where are the other Charmed cousins? The only thing that makes logical sense is for her to be Piper and Leo's son. I understand she didn't call them mom or dad, but neither did Wyatt or Chris. You can choose to believe it was someone else, but there is no question in my mind what the writers intended. They wanted each of the Charmed ones to have 3 children each. Let me introduce you to Roland Barthes and "Death of the Author": You're giving WAY too much weight to authorial intent, which is NOT what canon is supposed to be. Canon is independent of the writer's own thoughts and feelings. It's what's explicitly and directly presented in the work and nothing more. Any inferences taken from a work are FANON, period... And, no one fanon is more "right" than the other, because otherwise, it'd be canon. Their own little power of 3. Not that they'd magically be considered a new power of 3. Phoebe even mentions in season 8 how she wants her daughter to kick butt in groups of 3. Two boys and a token girl isn't a Power of Three. It's the Smurfette Principle.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2015 0:14:25 GMT -5
Take a look at TV Tropes, Tristan, they know what they're talking about here.
|
|
|
Post by tristancloud on Sept 10, 2015 14:25:48 GMT -5
No, but they wouldn't be considered an actual Power of 3. Each of the Charmed ones have 3 children to symbolize the power of 3. Also they didn't even realize boys could be witches in the first half of season 1.
If a character in any given tv show or movie said "Yes I have 2 boys and 1 girl" and then 2 boys and a girl walked up to her, we as the audience are meant to assume those are her 3 children. She doesn't have to look at them and say "Oh hello children of mine" for the audience to realize they are her children. In fact it would make the show seem even more scripted and unnatural if they just walked around proving characters were truly related. In a 5 minute segment that wraps up the rest of the sisters' lives, they didn't have the time to sit down and tell us everyone's names. They told us exactly how many children Phoebe and Paige had because they'd never given birth in the show before.
You really can choose to believe whatever interpretation you want to believe. I'm not trying to convince you to change how you've imagined the series in your mind. I'm jut explaining how I, and 90% of the other Charmed fans view it. It's up to the individual to choose what they believe and don't believe about a movie or tv show. For example, J.K. Rowling has said that Dumbledore was a homosexual in the Harry Potter books. However it never once says he is a homosexual in the books, therefore I don't believe it. Had it been heavily implied and the author clarified it, that may change my opinion. However in Charmed, they literally show each of the individual Charmed Ones with their children. It would make no sense for the little girl to be anyone else besides Piper's daughter. Otherwise we could infer that Paige's son's name is literally "Little Henry" because that's what she calls him. Assuming anything else would be fanon right?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2015 17:30:28 GMT -5
If a character in any given tv show or movie said "Yes I have 2 boys and 1 girl" and then 2 boys and a girl walked up to her, we as the audience are meant to assume those are her 3 children. Problem is, Piper didn't actually say that. In fact, Piper NEVER mentioned having a daughter in her voiceover: And, notice how that future potion mixing scene only included Wyatt and Chris. If they had a sister, then why wasn't she also there? Why wouldn't she get to be included in their demon fighting? I cannot believe that Piper/Leo or Wyatt/Chris would be such raging sexists to arbitrarily exclude her (such HORRIBLE implications, there, if she does exist). It would make no sense for the little girl to be anyone else besides Piper's daughter. Otherwise we could infer that Paige's son's name is literally "Little Henry" because that's what she calls him. Assuming anything else would be fanon right? Not an equal comparison. That boy was literally called Henry Jr. and identified as Paige's son ONSCREEN, so that's his canon identity, no matter what. Mystery Girl, on the other hand, was given no such identity onscreen, so it's up in the air who she could be.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2015 17:50:06 GMT -5
90% of other Charmed fans!? Can you personally cite any of the "90% of other Charmed fans" you mention here? If you can, please do so.
Clearly you weren't around during the Melinda Fallout at the old TCS board.
|
|
|
Post by tristancloud on Sept 10, 2015 19:29:46 GMT -5
Nope I'm brand new here at The Charmed Cafe! I've been on other Charmed sites though (Most notably CRP, Charmed Replica Pages). I've just never spoken to anyone in person or online who has thought Piper only had 2 children before in the 9 years since the show ended. So I didn't know that was even an interpretation people had!
[Scene: Police Station, Future. Henry brings in a teen.]
Paige: (Voice Over) Henry of course, continued to look after his parolees, even if they didn’t want to be looked after… (Henry sees Paige and the kids, a boy and two girls.) While still making time to help me with little Henry and the twins.
(He kneels down and the kids hug him. They squeal with delight.)
He was never called Henry Jr. Only Little Henry. By the "Death of the Author" thought process, the "Jr." isn't in his name at all.
I know, I'm saying that if any generic character was put in a similar situation, we as the audience are expected to interpret the meaning behind the scene. It isn't necessary to have everything explicitly stated.
Yes because Wes Ramsey and Drew Fuller are actors who have been established as Charmed offspring. Also their sister could easily be reading them the ingredients from the book of shadows or taking care of an innocent.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2015 8:59:12 GMT -5
I've just never spoken to anyone in person or online who has thought Piper only had 2 children before in the 9 years since the show ended. So I didn't know that was even an interpretation people had! You've clearly never heard of the Charmed Sons campaign: web.archive.org/web/20051030120700/http://www.thecharmedsons.com/Very few people wanted Wyatt and Chris to have a sister and rightly so. "The Charmed Sons + Smurfette" was NOT the spinoff they were campaigning for and tossing in a token younger sister completely ruins the Wyatt/Chris dynamic that had been established on the show. Two TCS fans, Shannon and Jennifer, went on to write their own spinoff in Destined, and they likewise struck down the idea of Wyatt and Chris having a sister (as well as Henry Jr. being biological): www.fanfiction.net/u/1163411/Twin-SwordsSo, no, it's nowhere close to "90% of fans" that agree with you on Mystery Girl. That especially wasn't the case 5-9 years ago, when there were more TCS fans active in the fandom.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2015 11:50:22 GMT -5
Dude, that is SO beside the point.
Whatever he goes by, Little Henry or Henry Jr., the fact remains that he was the only one of the Brood of Brats in that damned flash forward that was addressed by name onscreen, thus the name became canon.
On the other hand, as I have said more times than I care to remember, Mystery Girl has no canon identity at all. No matter what the comics call her, no matter what the rubbish Charmed Wikia calls her, the fact remains that neither are canon and it doesn't count!
|
|
|
Post by Melinda Halliwell on Sept 11, 2015 13:26:12 GMT -5
Maybe as Tim said had the show not done the flash forward then there wouldn't have been all this arguing over the Charmed Ones brood throughout these years from fellow fans obviously.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2015 15:06:07 GMT -5
Dude, that is SO beside the point. Whatever he goes by, Little Henry or Henry Jr., the fact remains that he was the only one of the Brood of Brats in that damned flash forward that was addressed by name onscreen, thus the name became canon. On the other hand, as I have said more times than I care to remember, Mystery Girl has no canon identity at all. No matter what the comics call her, no matter what the rubbish Charmed Wikia calls her, the fact remains that neither are canon and it doesn't count!Tim's said it all. Henry Jr. actually IS a canon name, regardless of whether or not he was actually called "Little Henry" in the episode. He obviously has the same name as his father, and "Jr" is the name suffix people use when they give their children the same first name as them, hence "Henry Jr." On the other hand, there's absolutely NOTHING pointing to Mystery Girl's identity in the dialog. Again, let's compare Phoebe and Paige's voiceovers with Piper's: Notice the bolded parts in the Phoebe and Paige quotes? Their children are all somehow explicitly identified as theirs. But, Mystery Girl? Not so much. Piper NEVER mentions having a daughter, and she NEVER appears again after the Lunchbox Scene. Most scenes just show Wyatt and Chris.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2015 17:07:54 GMT -5
Yeah, if they had left that flash forward on the cutting room floor, a lot of grief would have been avoided.
Yeah, this kind of goes against the idea of Mystery Girl being Piper's daughter, IMO.
|
|
|
Post by erikamarie on Sept 11, 2015 17:49:33 GMT -5
The answers are to be found only in the series
Piper says: when our kids were old enough to take over.
Our, in other words, Piper and Leo's kids, and indeed it appears the image of Wysatt and Chris, not of nine people
Before, they showed us Paige's children and the two daughters of Phoebe, later we'll see all the grandchidren of the sisters but when Piper talks about the next generation of witches, we saw only Wyatt and Chris
Do you remember Something Wicca This Way Comes?
Phoebe: Before Melinda was burned at the stake, she vowed that each generation of Warren witches would become stronger and stronger, culminating in the arrival of three sisters. Now, these sisters would be the most powerful witches the world has ever known.
Culminating: Prue, Piper, Phoebe and Paige are the greatest magic achieved by Melinda Warren's progeny Apart from Wyatt and Chris- diffent and long speech- Phoebe and Paige's kids''ll be normal witches
Phoebe's girls, as I told, dont' have special cupid powers because special cupid powers don't exist Cupids own a powerful ring, maybe they are immortal or maybe they may live a very long life,it's not so important
Moreover, a man who lived for love could agree to see his beloved wife and darling daughters as they age and die? I believe that Coop'ld opt for becomming a mortal, as Leo did
The same I think about Paige's kids Paige is half mortal, half whitelighter: according to the laws of genetic,s her children will be three quarters mortal and a quarter whiteligther, not enough to be able to orb
I don' think that a story to be charming has to be packed with characters full of powers - I didn't like Heroes and I'm sick of Marvel heroes- even the normal kids of powerful witches can be protagonists of an interesting plot Usually, many parents try to protect their children from the mistakes that they themselves did, so I am sure that Phoebe's girls will go to a good college and will be good students , more and more better than three fluttering silly cupids
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2015 18:55:46 GMT -5
The answers are to be found only in the series Piper says: when our kids were old enough to take over. Our, in other words, Piper and Leo's kids, and indeed it appears the image of Wysatt and Chris, not of nine people Before, they showed us Paige's children and the two daughters of Phoebe, later we'll see all the grandchidren of the sisters but when Piper talks about the next generation of witches, we saw only Wyatt and Chris And, if I had my way, that's ALL we would've seen. Wyatt and Chris were more than enough for the next generation, IMO. I don' think that a story to be charming has to be packed with characters full of powers - I didn't like Heroes and I'm sick of Marvel heroes- even the normal kids of powerful witches can be protagonists of an interesting plot Usually, many parents try to protect their children from the mistakes that they themselves did, so I am sure that Phoebe's girls will go to a good college and will be good students , more and more better than three fluttering silly cupids I agree 100%. I think WAY too many fans (like Kern) are obsessed with magical powers. Things like characterization and continuity are FAR more important for good storytelling, IMO.
|
|
|
Post by tristancloud on Sept 12, 2015 2:32:52 GMT -5
I think you are mistaking the word "identity" for the word "name". She has no canon name at all. Her canon identity is Piper and Leo's daughter. Their third child. Wyatt and Chris' little sister. That's not even including the Charmed comics. We are very clearly given this in the finale of the show. No amount of denial will change that.
Look, I get it. The premise of the Charmed Sons is great. When the show ended, I too had heard of The Charmed Sons and wanted it to happen SO bad! I loved Charmed, and I was very intrigued by the idea of seeing the future with Wyatt and Chris as the leads. But the premise of TCS was created before the show even ended. People fell in love with the name (and I get it. it's a catchy) and premise of the show before new information was given about the future of Piper's children. Now that it has been revealed that she has a daughter, you and the other TCSers out there will ignore all evidence that tampers with their precious TCS ideas in their own head. But that's all it is. Ideas in your head. Not Canon. The idea of Wyatt and Chris being Piper's only children is fanon. That author can write all the fan fiction they want about it but it will never become more than that.
Honestly I don't see how having a little sister would ruin the show's premise to begin with! The show could still focus on Wyatt and Chris. Their sister could be too young, or off to college or something in order to keep Wyatt and Chris as the focus. In fact they could have even killed her off later on for a shocking moment that spins Wyatt and Chris into a murderous rage for vengeance.
Plain and simple. No she is not Phoebe's daughter. They literally JUST showed Phoebe's daughters, why would they show another one? Especially when the focus is now on Piper's family? No she is not a friend that spent the night. She is Piper and Leo's daughter. That is canon and that is all.
|
|
|
Post by tristancloud on Sept 12, 2015 2:51:54 GMT -5
Oh don't get me wrong. I know his name is Henry Jr. I'm just pointing out one of the many flaws in your philosophy that only what is explicitly stated becomes canon and not what is seen on screen. According to you theory, his first name would be Little, middle name Henry.
Phoebe and Paige were the newly married sisters who hadn't had any children on the show to this point. Piper however had been married 5 years and had given birth to 2 children prior to the flash forward. Phoebe and Paige needed to explicitly state it while Piper didn't. When there is only 1 new child and Piper is the final Charmed One to wrap up the entire series, she couldn't go into the amount of detail you all would need in order to consider her their daughter. She talked about her children and their future while all 3 of her kids were shown onscreen.
Wyatt is the only one of the Charmed children that is twice blessed, meaning he and he alone is the only one that is extraordinary. Apart from Chris' orbing power, Chris is a normal witch. Now if you're referring to Wyatt and Chris being the only witches to have hybrid powers you'd be wrong. Mortals act as neutral when determining Charmed powers. The fact that Paige's children have a mortal father won't affect their powers at all. The Charmed ones aren't considered half witch half mortal. They're full witch because their mortal father didn't calculate into how powerful they'd become. Paige's children would be just as half whitelighter/half witch as Paige was. The only thing that could have changed this would have been if Paige had married a full witch. This would make her children 2/3 witch and 1/3 whitelighter. Then and only then would her children not inherit the ability to orb. While we don't have proof that Phoebe's children would inherit cupid powers, we don't have proof that they wouldn't either. The history of cupids is barely touched on and it is never mentioned that Cupids are random powerless mortals that were given jewelry.
|
|
|
Post by erikamarie on Sept 12, 2015 5:41:34 GMT -5
Witches are mortal, they could have powers, but this is not compulsory, we saw in many episodes many witches without powers
Magic and power are not the same thing
The Charmed One are mortal, full witch is an expression that means nothing, Prue, Piper, Phoebe, Paige are normal women with the the ability to deliver powerful spells, a spell vanquished the Sourse, not some random power
The Power of the Three had been expected for generations, the magic was the most important thing Indeed, the Jenkis sisters weren't able to call the Void, they needed Charmed power, magic power, Wyatt's power
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2015 5:52:47 GMT -5
That's true, isn't it. They're powerful witches, but a gun could kill them just like the rest of us humans.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2015 14:49:00 GMT -5
Honestly I don't see how having a little sister would ruin the show's premise to begin with! The show could still focus on Wyatt and Chris. Their sister could be too young, or off to college or something in order to keep Wyatt and Chris as the focus. In fact they could have even killed her off later on for a shocking moment that spins Wyatt and Chris into a murderous rage for vengeance. And, what a SEXIST premise that would've been! That is so NOT the spinoff I was asking for, no thank you very much! Plus, CHRIS was always supposed to be the younger/weaker/overshadowed child. With Mystery Girl, that role would automatically go to her, which is just all sorts of EW. Of course, it's all probably a moot point nowadays, as the chances of a spinoff being made are slim-to-none. A reboot is more likely, to which I say, BRING IT ON!
|
|
|
Post by erikamarie on Sept 12, 2015 15:56:35 GMT -5
Maybe I can't stand Mistery Girl as Piper's daughter because I loved TCS idea, it could be true: this doesn't change the fact that Piper not even remotely mentioned her daughter
I am a mom, could I talk about my job forgetting my two little devils? Never ever!
Sickly sweet Melinda or Prudence or Leonarda spoils the balance of the two brothers, Betty is right and I can't think of Piper, after her hard childbirth, coincided with Chris's death, after the bad battle with the Jenkis, to face playfully a third pregnancy:it's not like her
|
|